A Twisted Interview, Part Two
It’s a day later than I said it would be, but here you go. Part two of an interview I did for a UBC student’s research paper. This part includes some of the more heated questions about homophobic lines in battle rap.
I wrote a bit of preamble in part one, so let’s get right into the Q&A.
More Questions and More Answers
Almost every, if not every single battle I’ve seen has involved attempts to undermine the masculinity of one or both of the competitors, usually through associations with homosexuality. Do you think a lack of a homosexual presence in the community has led to this being a universal, almost go-to line of attack? Would that change if there was a larger presence in the scene?
I don’t think that a lack of homosexual presence has much to do with it. Rather, I think it’s the sense of humour of those involved in the scene. Look at the kinds of things we say outside of gay jokes: lines about raping someone’s girlfriend, performing horrible sexual acts with their mother, killing them as sadistically as possible, and so on. All of these lines are meant to be funny.
Battling appeals to people who have a crude and twisted sense of humour. Gay jokes are just one part of that. If you look at television shows with the same kind of humour – South Park, for instance – homosexuals are often the butt of the joke there as well. I think that homophobic content stands out more in battling because of the masculine posturing involved. But the intent is really to make people laugh (at your opponent’s expense, of course).
Crude humour will always be a part of battling. If there were to be a homosexual presence in the scene, it would have to be from gay people who are just as comfortable laughing at their own sexuality as they are laughing at jokes about someone defiling their dead mother.
Considering the general playfulness and lack of hostility within the battle rap scene, do you feel an out homosexual could feel welcome within it? Would homosexual battle rappers enter on the same level as straight rappers, or would their minority status put them at a large disadvantage from the beginning?
It depends on which particular battle scene they were involved in. There is a famous series of rap battles held in Oakland called Tourettes Without Regrets. If you watch the Fresh Coast documentary, battle champ TheSaurus talks about how that event typically draws a very gay-friendly crowd. Anyone who uses the word “faggot” at Tourettes gets booed off the stage.
The documentary also includes footage of a battle between TheSaurus and a rapper dressed as a sailor, who delivers his verses with a lisp. In that instance, you can see how the “gay” rapper actually had an advantage, since his stance forced TheSaurus to make gay jokes that would play to a gay-friendly crowd. (TheSaurus did just that by the way, and won the battle.)
That being said, there are other battle scenes where homosexuals would certainly be at a disadvantage from the start. An openly gay battler would probably not get such a warm welcome at a King of the Dot event. However, the great thing about battles is that a handicap can always be turned into an advantage, if you’re creative and skilled enough to flip it around on your opponent.
If you were to battle an out homosexual, how would you approach your battle differently? Would your verses focus on his homosexuality, or would the truth of those statements take away their power in the context of a battle? Is it possible to hit too close to home with your insults?
Yes, I would take a different approach if I were battling a gay guy, because I take a different approach for every opponent. And I would definitely focus on his sexuality, just as I focus on the stand-out characteristics of anyone I battle.
However, I would need to be a lot more creative in my writing than the typical “you suck dick” lines. What you said is correct: the fact that he does indeed suck dick would take away any impact those lines might have. The truth is not funny when plainly stated. But I’m confident I could come up with a surprising and hilarious angle of attack.
Epilogue
So that wraps up the interview. There was one other interesting point that the interviewer mentioned in his emails to me. He had also sent some questions to Dappa Dan Midas, the rapper who presented himself as the first openly gay battler (see his battle against A-Class, also linked in my previous post).
Midas told the interviewer that he is in fact not gay at all. He pretended to be in the A-Class battle because there were rumors about his sexuality circulating in the local scene, and he wanted to play to that.
This is not entirely a new tactic. I remember in the 06 WRCs, when Presence spit a rebuttal that was something like: “Yes, I am gay, you can suck my dick for real.” Putting aside the homophobia issue for a second, let’s look at these lines from a tactical perspective.
Is calling yourself gay a good strategy? It has shock value, to be sure. But beyond that, I don’t see where a battle rapper could really go with it. As I said in my last post battling is about degrading your opponent as a rapper and as a person. Unless pretending to be gay helps accomplish this, it’s not a good idea.
But who knows. Maybe someone will come up with a really clever, dope, hard-hitting line that casts themselves as homosexual. If any battlers are reading this, consider that a challenge.
Someone moved into your Village
Someone moved out of your Village
Promotions? Changing Village details?



